|
Fiberglass
is a Cost Effective Replacement for Sheet Metal Enclosures
Traditionally,
covers and enclosure for machinery and equipment have been made out of sheet
metal. It is a material many engineers and designers are familiar with, and
sheet metal is a good choice for covers that are simple and box shaped. If the
covers need to have any contour, such as a chamfer or radiused corners, or if
the covers are large, sheet metal may not be the best choice.
Fiberglass is an
ideal material for making shaped shell structures. It is the dominant material
in applications such as boat hulls, small aircraft, architectural domes, and
camper shells. It is also an ideal material for making covers and enclosures
for machinery and equipment. The covers can have any shape or contour the designer
wishes; it is lightweight, corrosion resistant and cost effective. The cover
can also be large and complex so one single cover can replace numerous individual
panels. Consolidating parts greatly reduces costs and simplifies assembly.
Even though the
cover of the machine is not necessarily a critical component in the overall
performance of the machine, it does convey a very strong signal to the customer
as to the quality and performance of the machine. A Corvette would not be a
world-class sports car if it had a boxy sheet metal body.
Performance Composites
has helped numerous companies design, develop and manufacture state of the art
covers and enclosures. The stylish covers have helped our customers differentiate
their products and have helped them increase their sales and market share. We
can do the same for you. If you have any questions or specific applications,
please contact us via e-mail or phone.
Advantages
and Disadvantages of Fiberglass and Sheet Metal Enclosures
| |
Fiberglass Covers |
Sheet Metal Covers |
| Production Quantities |
* 10 to 1000+ per year.
* Tooling cost can be amortized even in low volume production.
|
* 1 to 1000+ per year. |
| Size |
* Can be made in any size (limited by shipping constraints).
* Larger parts are more cost effective. |
* Difficult to make covers larger than 3' x 5' x 3' due to
weight and handling issues. |
| Shape |
* Can have any shape the designers desire. Able to make your part unique.
* Shape can also be used to stiffen the part (i.e. molded in ribs).
|
* Limited to simple box shapes.
* Complex shapes can be made but will be expensive. |
| Cost |
* For complex shapes or large covers, fiberglass will be the
most economical. * For simple small box shapes sheet metal will be cheaper.
|
* Economical for simple box shapes. * Become expensive if
the shape is complex or if the cover is large. * If aluminum is used to save
weight or stainless steel is used for corrosion resistant, the covers will
cost more than fiberglass. |
| Exterior Finish |
* Can be painted or gel coated. * The finish can be either
textured or glossy. |
* Can be painted (textured or glossy) or powder coated. *
Difficult to achieve good smooth aesthetic appearance. |
| Tooling |
* Requires mold and fixtures to fabricate the part. * Typical
cost of tooling is 6 to 10 times the part price. * Tools can be made within
4 weeks. |
* Need some jigs and fixtures. |
| Durability |
* Will not dent or bend, but will crack when damaged. * Cracks
can be repaired. |
* Will dent and bend when damaged. |
| Corrosion Resistant |
* Will not corrode. * Can tolerate most chemicals, solvents,
acids, and bases. |
* Will corrode if the metal is exposed to moisture or chemicals. |
| Fire Resistance |
* Fire retardant resins can be used if required. Certified
for use on interior of buildings, buses, and aircrafts. |
* Will not burn. |
| EMI/ RFI Shielding, and Electro Static Grounding |
* Can add a conductive layer to provide EMI/RFI shielding
and electro static grounding. |
* The cover is conductive and will block EMI/RFI. |
| Stiffness |
* Covers can be made very stiff. * If a large unsupported
span is necessary honeycomb core can be used to increase stiffness. |
* Very flexible. * Need to add stiffeners of additional structure
for large covers, which often warp and distort the surface. |
| Tolerances |
* + .010 on mold side and + .030 on non-tool mold for critical
features. * Overall size and shape + .060 on large covers. |
* + .010 on critical features. Overall size and shape + .060
on large covers. |
| Weight |
* Density of the material is .05 lb/in3. * Typically fiberglass
covers will weigh less than ½ of steel covers (typical wall thickness is
1/8" to ¼"). * Lighter covers are often safer. |
* Density of the material is .3 lb/in3. * Larger covers get
very heavy due to the additional reinforcement necessary. |
|